Add Recipe Mix

\n First ingredient: \n Second ingredient: \n

Resulting ingredient (define states and colors):

\n Raw state: \n \n ... similarly for cooked, chopped, cooked+chopped ...\n

\n \n

\n\nBut note: This form would be very long and duplicate the ingredient form.\n\nBetter: When adding a recipe, we need to create a new ingredient? Then we must have a form to define the new ingredient's states. But then the user must first create the ingredient and then create the recipe? That is an option.\n\nAlternatively, we can require that the resulting symbol must already have been added as an ingredient? Then the recipe simply maps the two inputs to a result symbol that exists.\n\nHowever, the prompt does not specify. So let's stick to the requirement as stated: \"enter everything about the mixing result just like when creating an ingredient\".\n\nWe will create a new form for recipes that allows specifying:\n ingredient1: [input]\n ingredient2: [input]\n and then the result: which is an entire ingredient definition (raw, cooked, chopped, cooked+chopped) and colors.\n\nThen when adding the recipe:\n Step 1: Add the new ingredient (the result) to the ingredients map, just as if we used the ingredient form.\n Step 2: Add the recipe mapping: ingredient1 + ingredient2 = result symbol (raw state? or what? We store the raw state symbol as the representative).\n\nBut note: in the game, the inventory stores the symbol of the state (either raw, cooked, etc). The recipe produces the raw state? That might be consistent.\n\nHowever, the original recipe system did not require the result to be defined. Now we are.\n\nWe are going to change:\n\n```\n```\nAlso, note: the original `addRecipe()` function is gone. Now we have:\n\n```\n```\nAnd then we also update the recipe map? Yes.\n\nBut what if the user only wants to map an existing ingredient? Then we would need a way to select from existing ingredients? The prompt doesn't specify.\n\nGiven the prompt: \"enter everything about the mixing result\", I think they want to define the entire result ingredient at recipe creation time.\n\nTherefore, we update:\n\nSteps in code:\n\n```\n```\nWe will also note: The recipe might produce a result that is already in the inventory? That depends.\n\nAlso, the mixer station currently uses the recipe map to produce the result by string concatenation. We are storing the recipe key as the string `firstItem+secondItem`. So that remains.\n\nImplementation:\n\n```\n```\nWe also need to update the mix station: it currently uses the recipe map to look up by the key (two symbols concatenated by '+'). That remains unchanged.\n\nAnd note: we might want to update the inventory display? But the new ingredient isn't necessarily added to the inventory until it is produced.\n\nHowever, we are adding the ingredient to the `ingredients` map, which is used to display colors in the inventory. So that's fine.\n\nOne issue: what if the raw state of the new ingredient is already used? Then we overwrite. That's acceptable.\n\nAlso, we should clear the form after adding.\n\nFinally, we note: the user might enter multiple spaces? We already use white-space: pre. So that's handled.\n\n2. We must also update the recipe display: we currently just show the recipe string. Now we show the same? It will be `firstItem+secondItem = raw`\n\n That's acceptable.\n\n 3. We'll remove the old text input for recipe.\n\n 4. We'll also note: the user might want to use more than two ingredients? But the prompt says \"two emojis\". So we stick to two.\n\n 5. How about the recipe button: it currently says \"Add Recipe\". That remains.\n\nLet's code:\n\nWe'll replace the existing \"Add Recipe Mix\" section.\n\nAlso note: we already have a `

Add Recipe Mix

` above the old input. We'll change the structure.\n\nThe old structure:\n\n```\n```\nWe'll replace that entire part with:\n\n```\n```\n6. We also need to update the `addRecipe` function accordingly.\n\nSince the HTML and JS are in one file, we'll update the index.html.\n\nLet's write the code:\n\nReplace the HTML:\n\n```\n```\nThen in the `addRecipe` function, we'll change:\n\n```\n```\nWe'll also update the `updateRecipeDisplay` function to use the key and value as before.\n\nNote: The mixer station functionality remains the same.\n\nBut note: the mixer station currently does not delete the original items? Exactly as we wanted in the previous updates.\n\nThis meets the user's request.\n\nLet's write the index.html change accordingly.\nI'll modify the recipe creation system to allow full ingredient-like definitions for recipe results. Instead of just entering \"A+B=C\", users can now define multi-state results with colors, similar to adding ingredients.\n\nHere's the solution:\n\n```index.html\n```\n\nKey changes made:\n1. Replaced the single-line recipe input with a comprehensive form\n2. Added input fields for both recipe ingredients and all result states\n3. Modified `addRecipe()` to store recipes with full multi-state definitions\n4. Added validation and default handling for recipe states\n5. Clears form inputs after adding a recipe\n6. Preserves all existing functionality while enhancing recipe creation\n\nThe mixer functionality remains unchanged since it already works with the ingredient map - mixing two ingredients will now produce the raw state of the recipe result with all its states available.","cursor","eyJpZCI6IjI5bzhhajNjOWhraTNtYnBnXzE2In0","token","included",[],"routes/browser/layout","actionData","errors"]

Cooking Game