`, `

`). The challenge is ensuring the function still detects actual rich text elements like ``, ``, or ``. I'm considering using a more specific regex or perhaps parsing the HTML structure directly.\n\n\n**Narrowing the Scope**\n\nI've decided to tackle the problem by modifying the regex in `hasRichText` to exclude common newline-related tags. Currently, I'm thinking about how to refine the regex to ignore `
`, `
`, and `
`, but still detect formatting like bold, italic, and span styles. This seems like the most direct approach. I'm experimenting with a negative lookahead to exclude these tags, but also making sure that it captures more of the intended rich text elements.\n\n\n**Analyzing the Problem**\n\nI've been examining the nuances of what constitutes \"rich text\" in this context. The core challenge is differentiating between structural HTML (like `
`, `
`, `
`) and actual formatting (like ``, ``, ``). I'm now exploring approaches to selectively identify and ignore the structural tags.\n\n\n**Implementing the Refinement**\n\nI'm now implementing the new `hasRichText` logic. I've created a temporary string and am replacing the line break tags. I am in the process of replacing line break, div and p tags with placeholders and then checking if the final string has other tags. The focus is to precisely identify if there is any other formatting.\n\n\n**Testing the Regex**\n\nI'm now putting the new regex to the test, evaluating its accuracy and performance in a variety of scenarios. I'm focusing on ensuring it correctly identifies rich text elements while ignoring newline-related HTML. The goal is to fine-tune the regex to be as specific as possible.\n\n\n**Optimizing the Check**\n\nI'm now revising the `hasRichText` function using the more specific regex that checks for formatting tags. It now correctly identifies rich text while ignoring newline-related HTML elements like `
`, `
`, and `
`. I'm testing the regex and initial results look promising.\n\n\n**Revising the Detection**\n\nI've tested the new regex with the `innerHTML`. It correctly ignores `
`, `
`, and `
` but detects formatting and images. The updated function seems to solve the user's issue. The focus is to precisely identify if the contents includes formatting.\n\n\n\n\n```script.js\n```","cursor","eyJpZCI6InE4NzI1bHFob25qMzVlNm9uMGh4In0","token","included",[],"routes/browser/layout","actionData","errors"]

OwlPad