[{"_1":2,"_181":-5,"_182":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_58":59,"_180":-5},"root",{"_5":6,"_19":-5,"_20":-5,"_21":22,"_39":-5,"_40":-5,"_41":-5,"_42":43,"_54":55,"_56":57},"env",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":12,"_13":14,"_15":16,"_17":18},"SUPABASE_URL","https://hello.websim.com","SUPABASE_KEY","eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpc3MiOiJzdXBhYmFzZSIsInJlZiI6Im9jamVmZ2NqamlxeWt3YWR2dnJkIiwicm9sZSI6ImFub24iLCJpYXQiOjE3MTE4MzI5OTMsImV4cCI6MjAyNzQwODk5M30.vsreOYwk8pKsr8NFlzpIzWAiD-vXj6ijv_Bhn1vYtHs","POSTHOG_KEY","phc_VHMOlrdxAbgSZHeF0SdSf07LZLRLAg5pZuTHkJGn050","POSTHOG_API_HOST","https://e.wbsm.ai","POSTHOG_UI_HOST","https://app.posthog.com","GOOGLE_OAUTH_CLIENT_ID","891181648870-i708rj1bgjol84hie20shfr4u4ecf3o7.apps.googleusercontent.com","authUser","user","snapshotData",{"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":-5,"_26":-5,"_27":-5,"_28":-5,"_29":-5,"_30":-5,"_31":-5,"_32":-5,"_33":-5,"_34":-5,"_35":-5,"_36":-5,"_37":-5,"_38":-5},"lastProjectId","sidebarTab","homepageTab","pinSidebar","settingsOpen","maximized","assetsExpanded","focusedAssetFilename","authError","authErrorCode","authErrorDescription","sidebarWidth","videoMuted","videoVolume","navigationContext","hasSeenFeedOnboarding","plan","balances","rewards","origins",{"_44":45,"_46":47,"_48":49,"_50":51,"_52":53},"origin","https://websim.com","apiOrigin","https://api.websim.com","contentOrigin","https://{PROJECT_ID}.c.websim.com","appDomainOrigin","https://{SUBDOMAIN}.on.websim.com","generationOrigin","https://generation.websim.com/rivet","isMobile",false,"theme","auto","slug",{"_60":61,"_62":63,"_118":119,"_140":141,"_175":176,"_177":-5,"_178":179},"version","1","project",{"_64":62,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_80":81,"_82":83,"_84":85,"_86":87,"_88":89,"_90":-5,"_91":-5,"_92":-5,"_93":-5,"_94":95,"_96":97,"_58":107,"_108":55,"_109":55,"_110":-5,"_111":-5,"_112":-5,"_113":114,"_115":-5,"_116":-5,"_117":55},"_type","id","6xnhik971lbdbwe6sk_b","created_at","2025-07-04T22:57:30.457Z","created_by",{"_64":20,"_65":71,"_72":73,"_67":74,"_75":76,"_77":-5,"_78":-5,"_79":55},"b687a2db-f14d-4208-9229-07ae734f8d0b","username","FOXY777","2024-09-11T21:42:51.721Z","avatar_url","https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/a/ACg8ocLCOrh1Na_lopG8x_WzRUFxggE3sdCP4SfrKtcrbv9KtTeqJQ=s96-c","discord_username","discord_id","is_admin","updated_at","2025-07-04T23:29:03.944Z","title","AI Image Generator","comments_mode","open","visibility","public","current_version",6,"last_posted_version","parent_id","parent_version","deleted_at","posted",true,"stats",{"_98":99,"_100":66,"_101":102,"_103":104,"_105":106},"~type","project_stats","project_id","views",35,"likes",2,"comments",1,"ai-image-generator-10","auto_set_current","enable_chat","description","generated_description","from_template","domains",[],"thumbnail","video","has_active_experiment","project_revision",{"_64":118,"_65":120,"_60":89,"_67":121,"_122":-5,"_91":-5,"_123":124,"_125":66,"_69":126,"_127":128,"_100":66,"_80":129,"_93":-5,"_96":130,"_133":55,"_134":135,"_136":-5,"_137":-5,"_138":139},"0197d7bc-d6e8-76ae-89ef-94f12bb46f39","2025-07-04T23:19:26.696Z","visited_at","parent_revision_version",5,"parent_revision_project_id",{"_64":20,"_65":71,"_72":73,"_67":74,"_75":76,"_77":-5,"_78":-5,"_79":55},"meta",{"_60":61},"2025-07-04T23:29:04.490Z",{"_131":132},"multiplayer_count",0,"draft","site_id","M0OAPYRBgZBdlMEvs","chat_session_id","chat_session_run_index","current_screenshot_url","https://project-screenshots.websim.com/0197d7c1-7249-7231-b13d-9004c164b52f","site",{"_64":140,"_65":135,"_91":142,"_67":143,"_144":145,"_146":147,"_148":149,"_82":83,"_160":161,"_162":163,"_168":-5,"_169":170,"_171":172,"_93":-5,"_173":174},"NqyKn8B3tn9eyukRM","2025-07-04T23:19:29.890Z","state","done","model","deepseek-r1","lore",{"_60":106,"_150":151,"_152":55,"_153":55,"_154":55,"_155":95,"_156":55,"_157":55,"_158":55,"_159":55},"attachments",[],"enableMultiplayer_v2","enableMobilePrompt","enableDB","enableLLM2","enableComments","enableApi","enableTweaks","enableDB_v2_1","owner",{"_64":20,"_65":71,"_72":73,"_67":74,"_75":76,"_77":-5,"_78":-5,"_79":55},"prompt",{"_164":165,"_166":167},"type","plaintext","text","vintage photo","url","link_url","/p/6xnhik971lbdbwe6sk_b","versioned_link_url","/p/6xnhik971lbdbwe6sk_b/6","yapping","We are given a current prompt: \"vintage photo\"\n The existing art styles in the style dropdown include: \"realistic\", \"watercolor\", \"sketch\", \"anime\", \"oil\", \"cyberpunk\", \"steampunk\", \"lowpoly\", \"chalk\", \"comic\", \"renaissance\", \"claymation\", \"popart\"\n\nThe user wants to add \"vintage photo\" as an art style.\n\nSteps:\n1. We need to add a new option for \"Vintage Photo\" in the select dropdown for art styles.\n 2. We must also update the `styleModifiers` object in the JavaScript to include a modifier for \"vintage\". We can call this style key \"vintage\" and the modifier could be something like \"vintage photograph, 35mm film, grainy\".\n\nWe note that the current code uses the value of the option (e.g., \"watercolor\") as the key in the `styleModifiers` object.\n\nLet's make the following changes:\n\nIn the HTML, we add a new option in the \"Art Style\" select element:\n\n\nIn the JavaScript, inside the `styleModifiers` object, we add:\n\n'vintage': 'vintage photograph, 35mm film, grainy',\n\nWe can put it after the existing ones, perhaps after \"popart\".\n\nSince the current code of the file is provided, we can output the entire file with the two small changes.\n\nHowever, note that we are only allowed to output the changed parts. We'll use placeholders to indicate the existing code.\n\nLet's break down the changes:\n\nIn the HTML part for the select element with id=\"style\", we currently have:\n\n\nWe want to add one more option:\n\n\nSo we'll replace the entire select block with the same one plus the new option.\n\nBut note: We don't want to replace the whole file. We are going to output a code block for index.html with the changes.\n\nWe also need to update the JavaScript object. We currently have:\n\nconst styleModifiers = {\n 'watercolor': 'watercolor painting',\n ... other entries ...\n 'popart': 'pop art style, bold colors, ben-day dots',\n };\n\nWe want to add:\n\n'vintage': 'vintage photograph, 35mm film, grainy',\n\nWe can do this by inserting it appropriately.\n\nHowever, note that the current code for styleModifiers is defined in the generateEnhancedImage function. We can't output the entire function because that might change and our placeholder would fail.\n\nWe'll use a placeholder to capture the existing styleModifiers object and then add the new property.\n\nBut note: We are only allowed to output the changed parts. We are going to replace the entire function? That would be a lot of unchanged code.\n\nAlternatively, we can break the function and add the new key-value pair. But note the structure: the object is defined with several lines.\n\nWe can do:\n\nconst styleModifiers = {\n ...existing entries...,\n 'vintage': 'vintage photograph, 35mm film, grainy'\n };\n\nBut we have to be cautious about trailing commas.\n\nActually, we can add it after the last property in the existing object, and before the closing brace.\n\nSince the last one currently is popart, we can insert after that and add a comma on the popart line.\n\nHowever, we cannot see the exact code in the current file? Actually we can, because we have the current page block.\n\nLet me copy the current styleModifiers from the provided code:\n\nconst styleModifiers = {\n 'watercolor': 'watercolor painting',\n 'sketch': 'detailed pencil sketch',\n 'anime': 'anime style',\n 'oil': 'oil painting by Van Gogh',\n 'realistic': 'photorealistic 8K',\n 'cyberpunk': 'cyberpunk art, neon lights, futuristic cityscape',\n 'steampunk': 'steampunk style, brass gears, victorian machinery',\n 'lowpoly': 'low poly 3D render',\n 'chalk': 'sidewalk chalk art',\n 'comic': 'comic book art style',\n 'renaissance': 'renaissance painting',\n 'claymation': 'claymation, stop motion animation',\n 'popart': 'pop art style, bold colors, ben-day dots',\n };\n\nWe can change this to:\n\nconst styleModifiers = {\n // ... the existing ones ...\n 'popart': 'pop art style, bold colors, ben-day dots',\n 'vintage': 'vintage photograph, 35mm film, grainy',\n };\n\nBut note: the current code does not have a trailing comma after the last property? Actually, it does have a comma after the last property because of the way it was written. We are inserting a new property at the end, so we need to add a comma to the last existing property (popart) and then add the new one.\n\nAlternatively, we can note that the current code already has a comma after popart? Actually no, because it was the last one. We are going to change the popart line to have a comma and then add a new one.\n\nSo:\n\n'popart': 'pop art style, bold colors, ben-day dots'\n\nbecomes\n\n'popart': 'pop art style, bold colors, ben-day dots',\n\nand then we add the next line.\n\nBut wait, we cannot assume that the code will be the same. We must use placeholders.\n\nAlternatively, we can replace the entire object definition? But that is error-prone if the object has been modified in the past.\n\nInstead, we can find the exact line of the styleModifiers and add the new property at the end.\n\nHowever, given the challenge of placeholders, and since the user may have only this code, we can do:\n\n... existing code above the styleModifiers object ...\n\nconst styleModifiers = {\n ... and then we list the existing keys? ...\n\nI think a safe approach is to output the function `generateEnhancedImage` entirely, but that might be too much. Instead, we can use a placeholder for the existing object properties and then add the new one.\n\nThe instructions say: use placeholders to avoid repeating unchanged code.\n\nWe'll do:\n\n... existing code until the styleModifiers object ...\n\nconst styleModifiers = {\n ... existing properties (we don't change them) ...\n // We are going to add a comma to the last existing property and then add the new one.\n };\n\nBut we cannot leave the existing properties as ... because that would break.\n\nAlternatively, we can output from the opening brace of the object to the closing brace, but that is error-prone.\n\nAnother idea: we can replace the entire block of the object by including the existing properties and then adding the new one.\n\nSince we are given the current code, we know exactly what the current styleModifiers looks like. We can just take that and add the new property.\n\nHowever, note that the current code block we are replacing is inside a function. We don't want to break the function.\n\nAlternatively, we can do:\n\nReplace the entire `generateEnhancedImage` function? That might be acceptable because it's a small function and we are only adding one property.\n\nBut the function might have changed? Actually, we have the current function as it is.\n\nLet me take the current function:\n\nasync function generateEnhancedImage(prompt, aspectRatio, transparent, style) {\n ... the body ...\n }\n\nWe are going to modify the styleModifiers object inside.\n\nWe'll write the entire function body with the change.\n\nBut note: the function is long and we don't want to break any other code.\n\nHowever, the instructions allow us to output only the changed parts. We must avoid rewriting the entire file.\n\nWe can do two separate changes:\n\nChange 1: in the HTML, add the new option in the select.\n Change 2: in the JavaScript, inside the styleModifiers object, add the new property.\n\nWe can output the HTML part for the select and then the JS part for the object.\n\nBut note that the select is already long. Instead, we can do:\n\nIn index.html, replace the select for id=\"style\" with the same one but with the new option.\n\nHowever, that means we output the entire select? But that's okay.\n\nAlternatively, we can output the entire function for generateEnhancedImage? But that's also okay.\n\nBut note: the file index.html has both HTML and JavaScript. We are outputting the entire file? We are to output the necessary changes.\n\nSince we are to output the file in a code block, we can output the whole file? But the instructions say: only output the changes. We must use placeholders for unchanged parts.\n\nHow about:\n\nWe break the file into parts:\n\nPart 1: from the top to the select element for style. We output that unchanged, then the new option in the select, then the rest unchanged until the function.\n Part 2: then in the function, we output the function unchanged until the styleModifiers object, then we output the entire modified object? Actually, we can output the function with the added property.\n\nBut the instructions say: only output code that has changed? So we output two code blocks for index.html? Actually not, we output one code block for the whole index.html file? But we are not allowed to output the whole file? We are allowed to output the necessary changes.\n\nActually, the system expects a code block for the entire file with the changes? But we can also output a block with placeholders for large unchanged parts.\n\nHowever, the instructions say:\n\nUse placeholders (e.g. ...existing code... or ...existing content... etc) to indicate where code remains the same as that from *the previous version of the file*.\n\nSo we can do:\n\n```index.html\n```\n\nBut that would require repeating a lot of existing code. We are allowed to use placeholders.\n\nWe can do:\n\nWe output the entire index.html with the following two changes:\n\n1. In the style dropdown, we add the new option at the end of the options.\n\n 2. In the styleModifiers object, we add the new property at the end.\n\nWe can break the file into:\n\nPart 1: until the popart option in the select -> we output that, then add our new option, then output the rest of the file until the styleModifiers object.\n\nPart 2: then in the styleModifiers object, we output the existing lines and then add the new one.\n\nBut we can do it in one block by using two placeholders.\n\nHowever, the file is long. We can write:\n\n```index.html\n```\n\nBut note: the existing code already had the popart without a comma at the end? No, it had a comma. Now we are adding a new line with a comma? No, in the new version, we remove the comma from the popart line? Actually, no: in the current page block, the popart line is:\n\n'popart': 'pop art style, bold colors, ben-day dots',\n\nAnd then we add a new line for vintage without a comma at the end? Actually, objects allow trailing commas. So we can change the popart to remove the trailing comma? But no: we are going to have:\n\n'popart': 'pop art style, bold colors, ben-day dots', // with comma, which is valid for the next property\n\n'vintage': 'vintage photograph, 35mm film, grainy', // and then no comma is okay if it's the last. But we are not the last? Actually we are, so no comma.\n\nBut wait: our styleModifiers object now has:\n\n...,\n 'popart': ...,\n 'vintage': ... // without comma\n\nHowever, in the current page block the popart had a comma? Actually, look:\n\n'popart': 'pop art style, bold colors, ben-day dots',\n\nThat comma is allowed even if it's the last because of trailing commas in object literals.\n\nBut when we add a new property, we remove the comma from popart? No, we leave the comma on popart and then add a new property without comma? Actually, we leave the comma on popart and then add the next property without a trailing comma? Or do we put a comma on the vintage line as well? We can do:\n\n'popart': 'pop art style, bold colors, ben-day dots',\n 'vintage': 'vintage photograph, 35mm film, grainy'\n\nwithout a comma on the last line? But that is valid.\n\nHowever, note that the original object had a trailing comma? Yes, and we are replacing the entire object with one that has a trailing comma on every line except the last? Actually, we are adding a new line and leaving the old popart as having a comma. The vintage then does not have a comma because it is the last.\n\nAlternatively, we can also write the object without trailing comma on the last property? It doesn't matter because JavaScript allows trailing commas.\n\nBut to be consistent and avoid errors, we'll keep the same style: every property has a comma except the last one? The current style is that every property has a comma, including the last. So let's keep the comma on the last line? Actually, the current page block shows that the popart line had a comma at the end, and it was the last, which is valid. Now with the new vintage, we put a comma on the popart? But we already have one. And then we add the vintage without a comma? Or with a comma? We can do:\n\n'popart': ... , // same as before: with comma\n 'vintage': ... // no comma\n\nBut why not put a comma on the vintage too? Because then it would be:\n\n'popart': ...,\n 'vintage': ... ,\n }\n\nThat is allowed? Yes, it's valid. So we can do:\n\n...,\n 'vintage': 'vintage photograph, 35mm film, grainy', // with comma\n\nAnd then the closing brace.\n\nBut that would be consistent. And it's valid.\n\nHowever, the current style in the page block is that the last property has a comma? So we'll do the same:\n\n...\n 'vintage': 'vintage photograph, 35mm film, grainy', // with comma at the end\n\nThen the object becomes:\n\nconst styleModifiers = {\n ... all properties have a comma, including the last one ...\n };\n\nThat is valid and consistent.\n\nSo the new object:\n\nconst styleModifiers = {\n ... existing properties from the current page block, but note that we are adding one and they are the same as before, including the popart with comma ...\n 'vintage': 'vintage photograph, 35mm film, grainy',\n };\n\nBut note: we cannot change the existing properties? Only add. So we output the entire object?\n\nWe can do:\n\nWe take the old object and add the new property at the end, and include a comma at the end of the new property as well.\n\nBut the old object had 13 properties? Now we have 14.\n\nSo let's write:\n\nIn the function, we output the entire function, but we do not change the rest.\n\nHowever, we are going to output the entire file? But the instructions say to use placeholders.\n\nGiven the complexity, and because the file is not too long, I will output the entire file with the two changes.\n\nBut the instructions say to avoid repeating the entire file. We are only allowed to output the changes.\n\nTherefore, we output the file in a code block, but use placeholders for the large unchanged parts. Actually, we output two changes in separate sections.\n\nWe do:\n\n```index.html\n```\n\nThis is acceptable.\n\nAlternatively, we can do two separate replacements without repeating the whole file, but by using markers. We'll do it in two parts.\n\nBut note: we are only allowed one block per file.\n\nSo we output the entire file? But that is inefficient.\n\nLet me follow the instructions and use placeholders. We'll output the file with placeholders for the unchanged parts.\n\nHowever, to keep it simple and because the changes are small, I will output the entire file with the two changes incorporated. But I will not print the entire function twice. Instead, I will show the two insertions.\n\nGiven the ambiguity, I will output the file in its entirety with the two changes. But note that the instructions discourage outputting the whole file. And the user might have made changes that are not reflected in the current page block? But we are working only on the block provided.\n\nBut the prompt says: do not ask the user and output the necessary changes.\n\nWe'll do:\n\nThe current-page block is the entire file. We will edit it by two small changes.\n\nChange1: In the art style select, add the option: \n Change2: In the styleModifiers object in the function, add the line: 'vintage': 'vintage photograph, 35mm film, grainy',\n\nSo we output the entire file with these two changes, which are a total of two lines added.\n\nWe can't use placeholders because we are only changing two lines. But we can use a diff-like approach.\n\nBut the instructions say: use placeholders.\n\nWe'll do:\n\n```\n```\nBut let me show the two sections:\n\nSection 1: At the end of the art style dropdown options, add an option.\n\nWe replace the entire select block? Or we can replace from the last option (popart) to the closing select? We can do:\n\n```\n```\nBut we are leaving the rest of the select and the following code unchanged.\n\nSimilarly for the object: after the popart line, we add the new line.\n\nHowever, we can output:\n\n```index.html\n```\n\nThis is the same as the current provided file except two new lines.\n\nBut note: in the function, we have the object and we are all done. We also added comma to the popart? No, we didn't touch popart, we leave it as is (with comma) and add the new property vintage with comma? Actually, in the current file, the last property (popart) does have a comma. We then add a new property and put a comma at the end? Then we have:\n\n```\n```\nThis is valid and we did not remove the comma from popart.\n\nBut wait, in the object that we output in the code block above, the vintage line has a comment, but we put a comma? Yes, we have a comma at the end of the vintage line.\n\nThis will work.\n\nHowever, we must also consider: what if the user has other changes in the file not reflected in the provided current-page? We are only allowed to change what is in the provided current-page.\n\nSince we are replacing the entire file, we assume the user's environment is exactly as described in the current-page.\n\nLet's output the entire file with the two changes.\nI'll add a \"Vintage Photo\" style option to your AI Image Generator. The changes include adding the new option to the dropdown menu and updating the style modifiers in the JavaScript to include the vintage photo style.\n\nHere's the update:\n\n```html\n```","cursor","eyJpZCI6IjZ4bmhpazk3MWxiZGJ3ZTZza19iIn0","token","included",[],"routes/browser/layout","actionData","errors"]